RACING

REDCOATS LEAD OWNERS REVOLUTION

 When highly talented galloper Red Ora heads into battle at Ascot or Belmont Park, he is always accompanied by an army of redcoats – in fact as many recoats as you will see in a concentrated area since that famous march through the region of Lexington and Concord.

It was this march that triggered the American Revolutionary War of 1775-83, as Paul Revere galloped through the dark New England night aboard Brown Beauty, and into the pages of history. Revere was, of course, out to warn his countrymen of the coming of the red jacketed British patrols, who were attempting to prevent him, and others, from alerting the countryside.

Now 240 years later, here on the major thoroughbred battlefields of WA, you will witness the modern day version of redcoats.

This is an army of red jacketed loyalists who move to an entirely different beat. These redcoats are there to exuberantly cheer on their prolific winning horse Red Ora and star jockey William Pike. As courageous a ride as it obviously was by Revere, and an exceptional weight carrying performance by poor Brown Beauty, it’s fair to assume that they didn’t receive a standing ovation like Red Ora and Pike when they reached the finishing line!

Like the British redcoats of 1775, the Aquinas College class of 1975 may lack experience, but at least they’ve enjoyed far greater success in their mission to become winning racehorse owners.

Like any great army, they ensure that they are always suitably uniformed in the red and black colours of their old school when they gather at the track and prepare for the redcoat war cry.

Breeder Gray Williamson was one of those in the class of ’75 – 1975 that is and not 1775!

It was Williamson, no stranger to horse racing success, who prevailed on his former classmates to join him in the world of racing and to experience a ride that has been every bit as exhilarating as Revere’s.

The racehorse breeder got his old schoolmates away to a flying start, as the horse he selected for them won its first five races straight. For many of the first time owner’s in the syndicate it was too good to be true.

The aim of these Old Aquinians was to simply have a bit fun and to socialise at whatever track Red Ora took them.

After the geldings fifth win in a row, Williamson laconically quipped, “now they are complaining they haven’t got any further than Ascot.”

When he added that he had never before raced a horse that had won its first five races, one of the red and black blighters quipped back, “and I’ve never had a horse that has not won five straight.”

Such was the confidence of the ‘red coated army’ in those heady early days with Red Ora. The galloper has now won seven times in his 12 start career (that includes two seconds and a third) for trainer Dan Morton.

Indeed, it was then interesting to be surrounded by Aquinians again. The last time it occurred, I was bursting into packs of them in Alcock Cup matches throughout 1965 when, as full back for Christ Church, it was my job to stop these barbarians-and their full forward Phil Mulcahy. They are still just as bumptious as ever!

Now here I was again- ‘doing a Dermott Brereton’ and weaving through another red and black throng of whirling dervishes, just like the Hawthorn legend.

‘Williamson’s Wonders’ epitomise the fun of racing and show the wisdom of having an astute judge to guide novice owners.

Originally passed in at the 2013 Magic Million Sales, Williamson substituted the galloper for one who didn’t ‘cut the mustard’ owing to fetlock problems.

The idea of the redcoats came from menswear retailer Mick O’Brien who decided to wear one from his shop’s range.

“Well that was it – then they all wanted one” he said of his marketing tour de force.

That is why, with a 32 strong group, the redcoats are a very visible force on race day supporting Red Ora, who resumes racing in January.

The redcoats eventually got to a country track, when the ventured to this year’s famous Kalgoorlie race round.

Red Ora, at his last run before going for a spell, flashed home from near last to run a neck third in the Hannan’s Handicap - a certainty beaten. He may well be one to watch in the Railway Stakes next year.

The syndicate now have another galloper, also a $20,000 purchase, called Red Hot Wind, a strong willed three-year-old who is expected to debut in March.

“There is no doubt racing has brought us together in a special way, particularly the wives who love frocking up for the occasion and we have 40 members in the new horse,” O’Brien said.

O’Brien is quick to see the irony in the fact that the idea to socialise at country race venues has led to regular trips to Perth for many, such has been the success of Red Ora. Some of the large group come from country areas as diverse as Borden, Corrigin, Hyden, Gingin, Dumbleyung, Scaddan, Wandering and Margaret River.

Gray’s wife, Jan, an integral part of the Mungrup Stud operation, made the point that orphan foals, like Red Ora, can often be tougher. “He was given milk four times a day from a bucket after losing his mum, Friartriar, as well as food supplement. Being around humans made him quiet and friendly and he was not hot headed like some Due Sasso youngsters.”

Jan Williamson’s point about orphans being tough has some historical basis. The 1961 Kalgoorle Cup winner, Maranalgo (Kingsley-Zawingie) lost his mother almost immediately when she got into the feed shed and gorged herself in an oat-eating spree.

The Ted McAuliffe trained bay went on to win some 12 races in his 72 start career, from 1957-64. He went to Kalgoorlie overnight, in 1961, arriving at breakfast time before going on to win the premier Goldfields race, the same day, ridden by Frank Treen.

Yet the interesting aspect of these two gallopers is not the similarity between them but the contrast in ownership models.

In Maranalgo’s time racing was mainly the preserve of wealthy independent owners. His owner, Albert Butler was one of many pastoralists in the game and he was the son of a transported poacher sent to WA on the last transport ship Hougoumont (arriving in January 1868). Albert, who started life as dingo hunter and trapper, ended up owning Maranalgo Station (near Payne’s Find) and Wee Maranalgo, just out of Armadale.

Interestingly, the genial, and ultimately wealthy, Albert was also an original Anzac, landing at Gallipoli on the first day of the eight month conflict that came to define Australia. He was twice wounded and returned to Australia at the end of 1915.

While there will always be single and dual owners the rise of syndications has allowed more people to race horses and to spread their interests over more than one at a time.

If Mick O’Brien is a good marketer of coats, trainer Dan Morton is doing equally as well appealing to new racehorse owners. Apart from the ‘boys syndicate’ he has attracted a very good ‘girls syndicate’ of owners with classy three-year-old Man Booker, last months Group 2 WA Guineas winner, complete with a female jockey riding their first horse.  Apprentice Jerry Noske, is the first female rider to ever win the Guineas as she also was in winning this year’s Kalgoorlie Cup aboard Woodsville, trained by her father, Jeff.

The two Morton syndicates had a BBQ together at Ascot, early in the new season. It resembled a gathering of allied forces.

Teresa Clayton, from Chaff City, said she loved the involvement of an all female group of 23 women getting involved.

“It is great to meet new people and a terrific idea of Danny to get all these women together. Previously their only association in racing was through the male interest of husbands, family and friends. However, he has never been under so much pressure as with this group,” she quipped.

Another Ascot trainer, Paul Jordan, concurred, saying that the beauty of group involvement is that it spreads the fun.  Right from the start of his career he wanted to train for groups of people and not be reliant on just one big owner. “There is nothing worse than being in the winner’s enclosure on your own. The fun of racing is to have excited people celebrating.”

Keith and Beverley Bell are two who have had a long association with Jordan and his racing manager, Harvey Crossman.

Keith Bell, whose father was a jockey and trainer in India, explained he had initially been with a small group before going solo. Copy’s Son was a galloper who won a couple at York before being a bleeder. Bell backed his galloper at the nice odds of 100/1 and that success helped pay for a Disneyland holiday.

Then came Kimi Gayo and he recalled how expensive vets bills could be.

“That horse put a foot through a float floor and was badly injured. Later we put her in foal and she died 11 months into the pregnancy. Bev said that was enough with horses and it was for about 15 years. The experience taught me not to be on my own.”

Coming back into racing at the turn of the century, with a share in Clickiton (three wins) the former shoe shop proprietors are currently in about 12 horses trained by Jordan.

“We generally have a five to ten per cent share and it beats having all your eggs in one basket. We now have something running most of the time. I get more of a kick out of it with other people involved and everyone dancing around in the winners’ circle. Take nothing away from Bob Peters, he deserves every success for what he puts into racing, but when he wins he is virtually alone in the winners stall,” Bell said.

After Clickiton came grey mare Clarecastle, a winner of four races (and over $200,000) a winning feat subsequently emulated by her two sons Castle Retreat and Chinetti that are curently raced by the syndicate. 

“We live in a street called Clarecastle Retreat, amongst a little nest of racing enthusiasts including Trevor and Chris Smitham, Paul and Luxy Loenhaut and Barry and Jacquie Bond, so we named her after our street,” Bell said.

However, it is For Your Eyes Only that has been the stand-out for the syndicate, with 10 wins from 27 starts, which by that stage, according to Keith, “Bev, no longer complained!”

As for the noisiest group of owners, well that is a shoo-in for the Chris Gangemi stable when Rock Magic wins, like he recently did in the Group 3 Colonel Reeves Stakes during the Ascot carnival. These owners make more noise than a Hawthorn premiership crowd and seemingly have just as many members. On the Richter Scale of racing enjoyment, this mob clearly reach a 10.

Racing Syndicates ….. bringing people together, now there’s a war cry – a catchy but simple slogan for the marketing teams at Perth Racing and RWWA to potentially consider.

Hoofnote  This article is in the current edition of Winners Circle available free at Gannon’s shop, on course, at Ascot.

History

REFLECTIONS ON GOUGH AND GOOD OLD SMITHY

It is interesting to reflect on two momentous Remembrance Days that still provoke thought and comment.

In February 2006 I took a group of Politics and History students to listen to Gough Whitlam (1916-2014) speak, at a Dymocks' literary luncheon at Fraser’s restaurant, of all places, in beautiful Kings Park, Perth.

Whitlam, then 89, accompanied by his wife Margaret, was in good form and quickly told the audience that “the restaurant was not named after Malcolm but rather a distinguished WA colonial public servant, Simon Fraser.”

He even knew that the school I was teaching at was an Adventist college. His knowledge of minutiae, always superb, was thus clearly evident that day.

At question time I commenced by asking the former Labor PM to reflect on Remembrance Day 1965. An interjector in the audience incorrectly said “you mean 1975.” I replied: “no I don’t, I mean 1965.”

I then proceeded to ask the former Labor PM whether he had ever contemplated “doing an Ian Smith.” Exactly 10 years prior to when Whitlam was sacked (11 November 1975) by Sir John Kerr, the same thing was tried on the Rhodesian PM, Ian Smith. It failed as spectacularly as it succeeded in Australia, a decade later.

Smith refused to be dismissed by Governor Sir Humphrey Gibbs and instead placed the Queen’s man under house arrest and then proceeded to govern for another 14 years!

Gibbs had moved to sack Smith because UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence from Britain) had been declared on that Remembrance Day of 1965.

Ironies abound: Whitlam, a republican, accepted his dismissal by Australia’s ceremonial head of state, the Governor General, while Smith, a staunch royalist, effectively decapitated the Rhodesian governor. 

The reason I framed the question like that, (‘doing a Smith’) was because in Canberra on that fateful November day Whitlam returned to The Lodge and told a few henchman, that “the bastard (Kerr) has done a Game on us.” Whitlam was referring to the 1932 sacking of NSW Premier Jack Lang by the State Governor Sir Philip Game, after a series of written warnings. (Ironically, Lang died in October 1975, only a few weeks before Whitlam was sacked, aged 98. Whitlam also died at the same age last year.)

Thus, Whitlam was wrong to equate Game with Kerr. Game did act honorably, unlike Kerr over 43 years later.

However, Whitlam’s reply to my question was that he did not think of emulating Smith.  As a QC,he was at heart a great constitutionalist. At the ensuing election, on 13^th December, he was trounced by Malcolm Fraser, the ‘Kerrtaker PM’ who had been the Opposition leader, until appointed by Kerr. Whitlam instantly dubbed him “Kerr’s cur.”

Malcolm Turnbull has never before earned applause from this writer but he deserves credit for his comments, past and present, on Whitlam.

Turnbull was recently taken to task by conservative Hal Colebatch, a capable writer, whose article What’s left if Malcolm is in the middle? (News Weekly 5/12/15) reveals Turnbull for the opportunist he has always been.

However, Colebatch is wrong in attacking Turnbull over his support of the sacked Labor PM.

The current Liberal PM, correctly, said that Kerr had not explored enough options with Whitlam. Turnbull argued that “the dictates of common courtesy alone would have made it proper.”

Colebatch argues that if Whitlam was so warned he could have had Kerr replaced (true), “a prescription for, in the worse case, civil war.” Oh, really? If the sacking of the elected PM was not enough to do that then the dismissal of an essentially bunyip aristocrat with delusions of grandeur and a white pompadoured mane, would not even come close to provoking that response.

In contrast, Sir Philip Game did accept the fact that he needed to formally counsel and warn Jack Lang before dismissing the NSW Premier on 13 May 1932. Lang, like Whitlam later, accepted the dismissal and also lost the subsequent election. Both Labor leaders have nothing to answer for at the bar of history for their behaviour in relation to the King and Queen’s men respectively. Colebatch’s speculation as to what Whitlam might have done is just that- speculation.
Colebatch should also be aware that the Queen's private secretary, Sir William Heseltine 'the boy from Wyalkatchem', who worked in various roles in Buckingham Palace, for 27 years, is also on the public record that Kerr acted too hastily in dismissing Gough. He said  that Kerr should have held the line for a bit longer because a political solution would probably have been reached (See 'No wake up call for Queen over dismissal,' The West Australian 12.04 11, article by Malcolm Quekett). 
Sir William also said as much, in his 2005 visit, to my Politics students. 

Colebatch is also wrong when he said, “Turnbull in what must be one of the most embarrassing passages in political writing ever” (said), ‘When Game (sic) sacked Lang he did so after public opinion had swung almost entirely against the Lang Government . Consequently Game’s (sic) action was vindicated in political terms by the landslide victory of the anti-Labor forces at the resulting election. Kerr(sic) is an entirely different situation to Game. Here public opinion has been moving steadily in favour the Labor Party……’

Given the electoral thrashing that Whitlam received it may appear, superficially, that Colebatch was right about Turnbull’s judgment, at the time.

In fact Gough as PM was winning the high stakes struggle over the struggle for supply (finance) and was only a day or two away from a stunning victory. The public, as measured by polls, were sick of the Opposition tactics of deferring supply and just wanted Labor to be allowed to govern for another 18 months. Tasmanian Liberal senator, Eric Bessell, had made it clear he would not vote to reject the Budget –at the time the Senate Opposition was ‘playing games’ by deferring a vote. At least another two Liberals were also likely not to toe their Leader’s line in the deadlocked Senate.

 However, after the dismissal Gough no longer spoke as PM, the Budget had passed the Senate, after Fraser had been installed as caretaker PM, and concern over the tactics of the Coalition in Opposition were then replaced with concern at the record of the sacked Labor Government.

As for the principled Bessell, thanks to Fraser, he was placed in the hopeless sixth position on the Liberal Tasmanian senate ticket. However, he received the fourth highest vote for his side, falling just short of winning his way back to Canberra.

Finally, Colebatch also has the irritating habit of putting the term (sic) after Turnbull ascribes only surnames to Game and Kerr instead of using their titles of Sir. However, he gives no courtesy prefix to either Lang or Whitlam.

Put bluntly Kerr deserves little respect for the way he mislead the PM who had arranged for his appointment as Governor General; for the contempt he showed the House and Speaker, Gordon Scholes in his hasty dissolution of the Parliament; for the secret advice he took from the Chief Justice (Barwick) and another Justice (Mason) against the advice of his PM.

Kerr’s drunken and debauched behaviour demeaned the office of Australia’s ceremonial Head of State. Being ‘sloshed’ at the Melbourne Cup, made him look more like Barry Humphries character Sir Les Patterson while making unwelcome and   “obsessive” overtures to Liz Reid (Whitlam’s advisor on Women’s Interests) were hardly actions that have endeared his memory to Australians-or her. Whitlam deserves criticism for recommending the appointment of such a man but not to be compared, unfavourably, to Kerr as an individual.

Apart from that caveat the rest of Colebatch’s criticism against Turnbull is valid.

Ian Smith

Ian Smith (1919-2007), like Whitlam, served in the Air Force during World War II and he was even more controversial.

I found Smith to be highly prescient because on 6th January 1998, while working in a political office, I had a long telephone conversation with him regarding human rights abuses by Mugabe. This came about because of the concerns of two fine citizens, Edward Preston (WA) and Wanda Teakle (Qld).

 Smith made the point then that there was already plenty of land to distribute, under existing willing seller-buyer arrangements, and that Mugabe was about to use land seizures as a political tool to divide people –precisely what happened in 2000 and the murder of white farmers and black farm hands is Mugabe’s legacy. In fact Mugabe had simply returned to his role in the Rhodesian Bush War as a terrorist but one operating from the president’s office instead of from the bush.

As for Smith, his prescient words were echoed five years later by noted author Peter Godwin. Writing in National Geograhic (August 2003) Godwin said that in the decade, by 1990, the Mugabe Government, had purchased 21 per cent of white holdings, lawfully. This right of first refusal began in 1985, some five years after independence and was funded by Britain.

However, instead of being given to landless peasants the land was used to enrich Mugabe and his ZANU party cronies. When the extent of this racket was revealed funding  was frozen.

The destruction of the commercial farming sector of Zimbabwe has followed the murderous assault of its farmers. The Zimbabwe economy is now  a basket case with, at one stage, hyper-inflation making Germany’s Weimar Republic, in 1923, look like a model economy by comparison. After all not many countries have a $50 billion note that is utterly worthless, as Griff Rhys Jones again reminded this viewer last night (14/12) in the excellent series, A Slow Train through Africa (episode 3).

 In 2008 the Zimbabwe inflation rate was 200 million percent, before the local currency was abandoned in favour of a multi currency approach. In contrast when Smith left office, mid 1979, the Rhodesian dollar was on par with the British pound.

Britain helped sell out Rhodesia and lacked the courage to ensure free and fair elections.

Mugabe should have been disqualified from the 1980 elections because of the intimidation that was going on under British auspices.

The short lived government from the internal settlement, that Smith had brokered, leading to Bishop Abel Muzorewa becoming the first black PM of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia, was dissolved. Margaret Thatcher’s Foreign Secretary, Lord Carrington, and the British Governor, Lord Soames, presided over the electoral arrangements for a new government.

When Smith, and others, protested over the massive intimidation going on, Soames replied that Carrington advised that disqualifying Mugabe would be unacceptable to the OAU (Organisation of African Unity). Soames further said to Smith, “the principles that you and I were brought up with are no longer part of this world.”

Probably because craven snake-oil politicians, like Carrington and Soames, were not prepared to stand up for those principles!

Smith’s Rhodesia was a land of milk and honey compared to the vicious thug, now 91, who has destroyed Zimbabwe over the last 36 years.

WA Politics/Racing

PICKING UP THE TAB 

Glenys Godfrey put the seat of Belmont in the news at the last WA state election.

Normally a safe Labor seat, the retirement of Eric Ripper (a former Deputy Premier, Treasurer and Opposition leader) was the impetus for change and the former Belmont City Council mayor won the seat for the Liberals at her third attempt.

The previous time the seat of Belmont, or Ascot as it sometimes has been called, was in the news was way back in 1971 when the then local member Merv Toms, the Speaker, died, early in the lifetime of the new Labor Government. The then Premier John Tonkin, who relied on the Speaker’s vote to govern, sought, and obtained from Governor Sir Douglas Kendrew, the proroguing of the Parliament, pending the by-election which Labor went on to win.

It might be thought that an appreciative Premier, now Colin Barnett, would be doing his best to help his giant killer retain her seat.

Instead he seems determined to cut the beanstalk down around her ears.

Mrs Godfrey is in the heart of racing country with Ascot racecourse an integral part of her electorate and with the winter track of Belmont about to be added to her electorate under a new electoral redistribution.

Not unnaturally she is not about to see her racing constituents future employment placed in jeopardy by the sale of TAB.

In fact it was the Brand Liberal Government (1959-71) that introduced the State Totalisator Agency Board, in 1961. It was implemented to ensure that Racing had a sustainable future as prior to that body being formed the stake money was deplorable with SP bookmakers contributing nothing to the enhancement of the industry.

Traditionally the Liberal Party although boasting free enterprise credentials has never been adverse to pragmatism and profitable state enterprises have never been anathema to the party’s principles…….until now it seems.

It has been mutually beneficial for Racing and the TAB as the industry depends on TAB funding and without Racing the TAB has no raison d’etre.

As Mrs Godfrey noted States that have done away with TABs have produced only disaster for their Racing industries -the third largest industry in Australia. “Racing Queensland is forecasting a $28 million black hole for the current financial year, following a $12 million loss on the previous year. Their deal with Tatts has been a fiasco,” she said.

“The Tasmanian Tote was even worse with an asset, valued in 2009  between $250-$300million but was subsequently sold off for $100million in 2011. That was patently ridiculous. It had been self-funded with Tote revenues until then but now Tasmanian Racing has a structural funding gap of $3-5million and a drop in prize money,” the Belmont member said.

Glenys Godfrey is similarly unmoved by arguments about ensuring racing is not worse off under a new privatised model.

“Their aim should be to make Racing better off, not the same, or why change from a system that is working?”

She said that the other states history had shown that the industry had been negatively impacted on and former Victorian Premier (and former Hawthorn FC president), Jeff Kennett, saying it was his worst decision.

Supporters of the TAB sale question why oppose something before benefits are known?

Precisely, for the reason that there are such meaningless platitudes about racing being no worse off when the evidence in other states gives lie to that fatuous claim. It is incumbent on proponents of change to detail the benefits of it before attacking those who argue ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.’ Far from being broke the TAB is flourishing.

The same proponents also query whether the government should even be in the business of gambling, ignoring the State’s involvement with Lotterywest?

John McGrath (Liberal, South Perth) said in the House “there is a lot of difference between Lotterywest and a betting and wagering agency?” Oh really, what? Both are State run and involve gambling.

This holier-than- thou approach is reminiscent of the Prohibition era in the US (1920-33). WA does not need another Wayne Bidwell Wheeler approach, leading to the imposition of greater problems, while embarking on some warped version of a moral crusade combined with deregulation gone mad.

 Mick Murray (ALP, Collie) also taunted the so-called country party, the Nationals, the junior coalition partner, for ignoring the social life of rural districts and he catalogued the impact racetrack closures would have on country towns.

His Labor leader, Mark McGowan, said that in the coming year there would be a 7.9 per cent increase to the racing industry and asked what other industry in WA is growing at that rate?

The Opposition leader said proceeds from the racing industry flowed to community organisations such as Riding for the Disabled, Royal Life Saving WA, the Paralympic Committee, Sea Rescue, Lifeline etc.

“Do members think the major corporates who own the TAB in the Eastern States will make such contributions? Does anyone think they do?”

Indeed the corporate bookies are as useful to Racing as the old down-the-lane SPs were in the bygone era.

As McGowan said they operate for shareholders whereas the WA model ensures the maximisation of profits to racing in WA.

The confused debate of September 16 was in the words of the Premier “an embarrassment.” It was, and particularly by an executive so clearly out of touch.

The Premier has already forfeited the State’s Triple A rating; has broken his promise of 2013 not to sell the TAB; treated with contempt the overwhelming majority of stakeholders and ignored his principled backbenchers, Glenys Godfrey, Murray Cowper and Graham Jacobs with their real concerns over the sale of the TAB.

WA and Racing deserve better.

Politics

TURNING TOWARDS A NEW ‘ALA’

It was nice of Dr Ameer Ali in his shoddy polemical attack on the Australian Liberty Alliance to remind us of the anti-Islam rhetoric of Peter the Hermit (1050-1115).

Ali, after his trip down a medieval lane, while writing in The West Australian (5/11), then likens the new political party to the KKK in his diatribe of nonsense.

Just why Ali wants to remind us of the brutal history of Islamic aggression is known only to him-but remind us he does.

The Crusades, far from being wars of aggression, were in fact defensive wars coming after four centuries of Islamic aggression and the capture of two thirds of the old Christian civilisation.

There was of course brutality, as in all wars, and the attack by some knights on German Jews, en route to Jerusalem, was despicable and condemned by the Church.

 Unlike Islam, Christianity does not exonerate adherents from crimes committed against others, and unlike many current Islamic practitioners does not call for the destruction of Jews and Israel.

Far from being ‘confrontational’ and ‘medieval,’ (like Islam has always been), as Ali asserts, the ALA is the product of concerned, responsible citizens who are fed up with a craven, fawning  political and media elite that denigrates their concerns of Islam.

The ALA president, and WA Senate candidate, Debbie Robinson, demolished Ali’s cant  in a well reasoned rebuttal (The West Australian 6/11).

As Robinson said there is no moderate Islam that is simply wishful thinking on the part of liberals. Islam means ‘submission’ and is an all embracing ideology. There is no separation between mosque and state.

Non-Muslims are always lesser citizens at law and in treatment, under Islamic rule.

Indeed how many Christian churches are there in Saudi Arabia and how many are being built? The answer is the same for both –none. Yet Ali has the temerity to rail against those citizens in Bendigo who do not want a mosque built.

Unlike Muslim’s in the Middle East, they are not rampaging through the streets of Bendigo, destroying, murdering, raping, assaulting and denying people a right to go about their business. Instead they are engaged in a legitimate exercise in civics in seeking to resist the encroachment of something they regard as alien and opposed to the traditional values of Australia.

When comments are made by Muslim clerics, like the Jordanian Sheikh Ali Hassan Al-Halabi, that the killing of ‘evil’ Jews, “the brothers of apes and pigs, is a  binding and mandatory duty,” it does not do a lot for interfaith harmony and social cohesion. Of course it may have nothing to do with Islam, as we are so frequently told, but the citizens of Bendigo, are just a tad concerned that such comments represent hate speech and they do not want it being fostered in that community.

A democratic state does not have to stand by and see a community subsumed by the intolerant demands of two percent of its citizens, accompanied by violence and vilification against the majority –and this country is not going to stand for such behaviour.

As constitutional law professor Augusto Zimmermann has argued the right to religious freedom while important is not absolute. The High Court in the Jehovah Witnesses Case (1943) ruled against that church after they had appealed to the High Court under Section 116 of the Australian Constitution. However, the Court determined that the National Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations 1940 did not infringe against the said section of the Australian Constitution. The judgement was based in part on an interpretation of the Defence Power of the Commonwealth, demonstrating the possibility of reducing religious freedom during times of national emergency, especially when religious extremism is involved.

Recent disgusting comments by the group Hizb ut-Tahrir (banned in Germany) describing Australian security officials as ‘cockroaches’ does not sit well with Australians. Not surprising given the recent murder of a police civilian in NSW, by an Islamist thug, and the Sydney Lindt Café siege in mid-December last year which resulted in the murder of the manager and a customer. This odious group demands a caliphate to rule all Muslims and the imposition of Sharia law.

This Muslim group says cooperation with spy agenies is ‘outright haram’ (forbidden). A spokesman, Uthman Badr, claims Muslims should not have to submit to an oppressive campaign of so-called forced assimilation such as pledging support for democratic principles in the oath or singing the national anthem. Islam’s values are not negotiable, according to him, but most Australians consider that neither are time honoured Australian values.

As Professor Zimmermann says this radical group is the perfect example of a group that should be outlawed.

Australians want one law (not Sharia), equal rights for women, freedom of expression, democracy, separation of church and state, the right to be critical without being intimidated and the requirement that people who come into the country respect the nation’s ideals and traditions. Australians expect freedom of religion as well as freedom from religion and that includes the right of individuals to freely decide which path they take. That is not the experience in Islamic countries.

As Robinson said the ALA is not about hating anyone but rather the opposite in  promoting basic human rights in the western tradition. Ali, by way of contrast, regards her concerns, and those of the ALA, as on a par with Daesh scum, while he makes no mention of Badr and Hizb ut-Tahrir’s truly polarising comments.

Where too is Ali’s excoriation of the current atrocities against Christians, and other minorities in the hell-holes of failed Muslim States? He blames it on the former colonial powers. Failure it seems is never the failing of Muslims!

Unlike Geert Wilders, whom he vilifies, Ali does not require a constant police guard to ensure his safety, and whom is Wilders being protected from in the Netherlands? Could it be Muslims?

Particularly odious, gratuitous and offensive is Ali’s remarks about hoping the ALA does not become like the KKK? If there is anything like the KKK it would have to be Islam with its track record of ensuring the death of some 270 million, in its brutal intolerant 14 centuries of existence.

The ALA is not calling on people to go on a rampage against anyone, nor would it accept people of minority faiths having their homes marked as such for future “attention.” That does mean for rape and murder in territory held by murderous criminals whose religion has everything to do with Islam.

However, Pakistan is not governed by those animals and yet in that country homosexuals are thrown off the top of high rise buildings while a young married couple were hurled into a blast furnace. What was their crime? They were Christians. How shameful!

Despite Ali’s assertion about the threat from ‘confrontational minorities’ the only confrontational minority in this country comes from followers of Islam, and it is that which ‘threatens the multicultural harmony that has been built over decades.’

The ALA is no threat at all and many Australians are listening to the disciplined, controlled and reasonable statements of the new party.

Perhaps it is somewhat ironic, as one wit described, that in their legitimate concerns over Muslim aggression and anti-social behaviour Australians are now looking to  a new version of ‘Ala ‘– one with not only a different spelling but also a more democratic version than the Allah the Muslims are used to worshipping.