FROM RAINBOW TO RACIST
NATION
The
obsession with race in South Africa has clearly not ended with the demise of
National Party rule in 1994.
Despite all
the verbal dross to the contrary the ANC remains, after 22 years in government
as obsessed as even the strongest verkrampte
in the long years of Nationalist (White)
rule.
Cricket is a
case in point.
After a
generation in the wilderness, from 1970, South Africa was readmitted to
international cricket with a one day match against India in November 1991 and a
test match against the West Indies in April 1992.
SA were
clearly the best side in the world when they were excluded from international
cricket after having smashed Australia 4-0 in four Tests, following Australia’s
comprehensive victory over the Indians in the sub-continent.
If racial
selection was the reason for South Africa’s isolation in 1970 then there has to
be grounds for South African exclusion today.
The ANC
seemingly want to run a slide rule over everything to ensure their ‘white
minority’s noses are perpetually rubbed in it,’ and the latest quota system
proves that fact.
Cricket
South Africa (CSA) has determined at government urging that of the 11 players
six must be black (that includes mixed race and Asians) and two of those must
be African. In SA domestic cricket, at provincial level, three of the 11 must
be African.
The
rationale for this nonsense is ‘to make up for the grave injustices of the past,’
which means another generation of players will be judged on the colour of their
skin rather than their ability.
In fact it
has already happened. In 2007 Cricket World Cup squad, Loots Bosman and Roger
Telemachus were selected over the much more deserving Dale Steyn and Albie
Morkel, simply to make up a required quota of seven black players. In 2015 it
was Vernon Philander who was preferred over the in-form Kyle Abbott.
Instead of
making these disgraceful selection cases a cause célèbre the appeasers in the
western media and sporting officialdom pass by on the other side, like those who
preceded the Good Samaritan.
Some of us
remember the media furore over the exclusion of the dignified and talented
Basil D’Oliveria. Then the media , rightfully,‘ went into bat’ for ‘Dolly’
against the Vorster Government who did not want a Cape Coloured playing in the
England team of 1968.
Today, there
is, of course, nothing wrong in vigorously supporting a program to encourage
African youth into the game as only seven of 90 players, since re-admission
have come from this group (The Economist,
19/9/16).
Indeed, the
nurturing program is essential to encourage African youngsters as only 4 -20
percent of black primary school pupils play the game. Cricket gear is more
expensive and poor African schools do not have the financial resources to fund
it, unlike soccer and rugby, sports that essentially just need a ball. This is
the real challenge for CSA, not racial quotas.
However, by
just giving a place to an African, at the expense of other black or white
players, simply corrupts the selection process, demeans the playing worth of
the African individual selected and creates team and social disharmony.
This new
policy is a racially extended version of the quota regime, (1998-2007), where
the national side had to field four black players minus any stipulation on the
number of Africans.
Despite the
political posturing of black administrators and politicians, racial quotas do
not ‘cut the mustard’ with any section of the RSA populace. Some 77 percent of
South Africans think quotas are wrong and that ranges from 70 per cent of
Africans to 95 per cent of Asians (plus 87 per cent of Coloureds and 83 per
cent of Whites also concurring), according to a survey by the SA Institute of
Race Relations.
Former NZ
All Blacks Rugby coach, Laurie Mains, who worked in RSA in 2000-1 said the
Springboks days of being a top power were over because of their rules on ‘racial
inclusion.’ In reality this is racial exclusion except in the Orwellian world
of doublespeak which is the RSA.
Mains
originally supported such a policy but said that was 15 years ago and that such
a policy was never meant for the long haul.
Yet the ANC
Sports Minister, Fikile Mbalula, saw fit to tell the SA rugby, cricket,
athletics and netball bodies, in April, that their failure to meet
transformation targets (read black privilege)
meant they were forbidden to bid for or host international competition.
Jacques
Kallis rightly said he was ‘embarrassed’ by the decision but international
bodies should impose bans on SA for their blatant denial of selection on merit.
This after
all was the blow dealt to those magnificent cricketing Springboks, particularly
of the 1963-70 period, because they were an all white side with other groups
unable to be selected in that era.
The current
system is just a watered down version of blatant racial preference.
Interesting
too is just why the national cricket side is called the Proteas, whereas the
national rugby side still is called the Springboks? But then logic and fairness
has never been a strong suit of the ANC.
That is
clearly shown by the disgraceful manner the the 1970 side has been treated by
black officials.
The players
were not politicians and a true rainbow nation would honour these greats from a
bygone era.
However, the
reverse was the case, particularly from 2000, when the then new chief of SA
cricket, Gerald Majola, also became their tormentor- in- chief. He was to
cricket what Robespierre was to French political life during the revolution.
Ultimately
this disgraceful ‘administrator,’ with his snout in cricket’s trough, was dismissed
by CSA for failing to disclose unpaid bonuses, misuse of travel allowances and
lying.
Majola ‘s hated
South Africa’s ‘Invincibles’ simply because they were white.
In a classic
case of reverse racism Majola made sure the SA greats were snubbed in many ways
as catalogued by that fine historian, RW Johnson. These slights included:
*ensuring privileges to ex-players and their wives were
removed or reduced
* snubbing of white players who offered their expertise as
coaches
* purging of honour boards and old photos of white cricket
sides before 1992
* players from that earlier era had their numbers taken away
and basically CSA started at one in 1992, despite SA being a foundation nation
of Test cricket, first playing against England in 1888 and Australia, 1902
* waging an unsuccessful two year campaign to have South
African Test matches expunged from the record books, pre 1992, instead it was
he who was sent packing by Lords
* when the legendary batsman Graeme Pollock remonstrated with
him about unfairness, Majola upbraided the greatest ‘Bok batsman in front of
some old members with the words, “you guys had your day, now get lost.” That was
akin to someone in Australian cricket telling Sir Donald Bradman to get lost.
* Majola, ever the puissant, followed that classless act up
by renaming the SA national schools cricket week after his brother claiming he
may have played for SA but for his colour
* brought in racial quotas favouring blacks but using weasel
words like ‘targets’ to describe them.
Incredibly, Barry Richards had, at that stage, never been
invited to a South African cricket function by the new regime; and neither he
nor Pollock have been honoured by having grandstands, or entry gates named
after them.
Anyone, like this writer, who was privileged to see Pollock
(274 runs) and Richards (140) in the second Test at the Old Kingsmead ground,
in 1970, will never forget the devastation wrought on Australia by those two
great Springbok batsmen in one of the great partnerships of all time.
Basil D’Oliveria was similarly snubbed by the ANC because he
refused to toe the line of the post 1994 government.
How quickly the ANC forgot President Mandela’s gracious and
powerful symbolic reconciliation gesture of appearing at the Rugby in a
Springbok jersey and cap and shaking hands with the SA captain Francois Pienaar.
Instead, like the French Bourbons of old, they
have learned nothing and forgotten nothing.
The
so-called rainbow nation is simply a myth, in reality South Africa is just another
tawdry diminished, revenge nation with spiteful black racist rulers abusing the
rights and traditions of the minority.
No comments:
Post a Comment