Politics

MARRIAGE DESTRUCTION AND THE NEW GAYSTAPO

The vote, in Ireland, to destroy the institution of marriage is a tragedy and no reason to celebrate.

The twitter world has produced a society of morons whose depth of knowledge revolves around the latest tweet.

In restaurants, on walk paths, in surgeries, aboard public transport just look at these addicted junkies dialing their digits off. I have even seen bike riders, wobbling all over the road, ‘keeping up to date,’ with the ‘news.’

The destruction of marriage under the guise of Orwellian terms like ‘marriage equality,’ is on a par with the other tripe words such as homophobia and Islamophobia-meaningless cant.

The current numbers in the Australian Parliament do not support the destruction of marriage. However you would be like the little boy with his finger in the dyke thinking that some of the ‘nervous nellies’ will resist the floodwaters. Satiating the empty vessels making the loudest noise is a time honoured pastime of those with the backbone of an amoeba.

Let us be clear: there is no persecution, or prosecution of homosexuals in Australia, unlike in Islamic countries, and no-one supports such activity against them.

However, the ‘two percenters’ (Muslims and Homosexuals) have disgracefully attacked those with traditional views.

For people like deputy ALP leader Tanya Plibersek to say that clergy will not be forced to marry homosexuals is to fly in the face of reality.

Tell it to the marines, Tanya. Here are just a few recent examples of tyranny against the clergy and traditionally minded people:

*in Idaho Christian ministers were ordered to perform same sex marriages or face 180 days in prison and fines of $1000 per day

*some British MPs have threatened to remove clergy from issuing marriage licenses for failing to conduct same-sex marriages

*in the US, Canada and Denmark pastors or religious organizations have been forced to allow same-sex marriages in their churches

* Chief Rabbi in Amsterdam, and a RC Bishop, in Spain were threatened with hate speech for restating their religious traditions

* the deputy chief psychiatrist in Victoria was pressured to resign his position on the Victorian Human Rights and Equal opportunity Commission because he said children do better with a mum and dad
 * SBS, a public broadcaster, pulled an ad in March, opposing Gay Marriage, while at the same time giving public endorsement to the so-called Gay cause the same month, even urging SBS staff to be in the Mardi Gras Parade. This organisation that should be reporting the news is now a participant on one side. The Communication Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, thas done nothing to prevent this travesty, twittering like a latter day Nero, because he supports the change to marriage
* Queensland doctor, David van Gend, of the Australian Marriage Forum, suffered a graffiti attack on his surgery, in early June, by the 'apostles of toleration' simply because he supports traditional marriage.

 Indeed, globally, there has been a plethora of people charged for not accepting a commission to officiate at  homosexual weddings, Cake makers, photographers, florists, restaurants, accommodation owners have either been prosecuted and persecuted for not wanting to be involved, in what they regard as a counterfeit union, because of their religious convictions.

Plibersek’s promises about churches not having to worry about a regime change on marriage are as meaningless as those made at Munich in 1938. Just as that sell-out, by the appeasers, doomed Czechoslovakia so too will the new appeasers destroy the family unit on the altar of PC madness.  

When in doubt follow form, is an old racing adage. Plibersek’s ‘form’ is to argue that the Liberal Party should have a free vote on Marriage Destruction while her own side, Labor, should have a block vote. There are currently 11 Labor MPs that will cross the floor if the ALP National Conference is mad enough to embrace the ‘Plibersplit’ line.

There should, of course, be no need for people holding traditional values in business to be prosecuted, or penalised, because there are plenty of others that will accept a fee for service to bake a cake or provide photography to homosexuals.

However, that does not satisfy the new Inquisitors who have the Star Chambers set up to accommodate them. The new order stresses there must be an accounting by those who are now deemed to be heretics in the new world order.

Two prominent Australians to suffer at the hands of the ‘tolerance industry’ mob are tennis great Margaret Court and long standing Shop Assistants union chief, Joe de Bruyn.

Homosexuals demanded, fortunately unsuccessfully, the Rev. Margaret Court’s name, disappear from the Tennis Australia arena because they opposed the former champion tennis player’s views on marriage; de Bruyn was less fortunate being denied a union meritorious service award, after 36 years as leader of SDA, because he dared to express  ‘outrageous’ views in support of the traditional family. An example of his ‘extremism’ is the following: “the family is the fundamental institution in society and we ought to promote and enhance the family unit, not pass laws that have the effect of tearing it down.”

As Miranda Devine (Sunday Times 31/5) reminded us, “Marriage is not the plaything of politicians. It is a universal, foundational institution which is protected by the law, not created by it.”

 Devine added, correctly, “Marriage has always been the union of a man and a woman” and “is not a vehicle to validate adult romantic interests.”

She is right to say the matter cannot be left to the “cowards and cynics of our political class,” the Australian people must decide this issue.

The homosexual lobby has always claimed they have majority support so therefore they should not mind a national plebiscite to test their claim.

That, by definition, sinks Tony Abbott’s premise about the “parliament having to own the change” of marriage definition.

Let it be owned by the nation, for good or bad.